[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [regrep] [Deadline Tomorrow] Re: [regrep] XML2004 abstract deadline: May 7
Excellent - recommend clarifying early on (or in the title) that "ISO/TS 15000 based Registry / Repository" is synonymous to OASIS/ebXML Registry, and using one consistent reference throughout. Encountering "OASIS/ebXML Registry" late in the abstract could throw the reader into an intended subject shift. Joe Carl Mattocks wrote: > > Here is the proposed 500 word abstract addressing Semantic Content > Management Using ebXML Registry .. > nit picking comments welcome .. > > title = Managing Medical Ontologies using OWL and Registry / Repository > > The Semantic Web is about the autonomous discovery and assembly of > dis-tributed remote resources. Which is based on the automated sharing of > meta-data terms across Web applications that provide a common approach for > the discovery, understanding, and exchange of semantics. This presentation > out-lines how the e-health knowledge embedded in Upper and Lower > Ontologies support the web service discovery task that may involve the > interaction of in-dependent resources from different domains and owned by > different entities. In particular, it identifies the challenges of > development and publishing re-quired by agents representing the > stakeholders that use OWL ontologies to both assist the discovery process > and also to pull the services together into a workflow. Such as, the > semantically enriched web services being developed for ARTEMIS an > international project which provides interoperability of medical > information systems. > > The audience will understand how specific knowledge management chal-lenges > are addressed including - how using ontologies for managing content > ensures a high level of relevance for the knowledge that is being > associated with the semantic annotations. Given, documents can be viewed > (and there-fore indexed) according to different views of the world, and > assigned different classification schemes used for different purposes. > Further, why a multidi-mensional view of the world requires use of several > ontologies, not as a single classification hierarchy, but as a product of > orthogonal hierarchies. Given (1) a large overlap among the subject fields > involved and (2) a large number of codes and rubrics, typically in the > order of magnitude of 10000-100000 entries, in commonly used > terminological systems; > > Additionally, participants will learn how the enterprise content > management capabilities of ISO/TS 15000 based Registry / Repository are > used to met the challenges. For instance, although the ISO/TS 15000 > standard does not ex-plicitly reference semantic content capabilities the > session will shown how it is already being used to associate web services > with OWL ontologies. Specifically, in addition to explaining the approach > used by the Artemeis project, the speaker will show how the Mayo Clinic > has successfully used the Registry / Repository for their Ontological > investigations. Referencing, how the Electronic Health Record (EHR) is > defined by two ontological levels. (1) Level One On-tology represents the > high-level classes and relationships for the entire longi-tudinal HER (the > classes are domain independent); (2) Level Two ontology represents > clinical concepts in the form of classes and the relationships be-tween > those classes; (3) Classes in the Level Two ontology can be repre-sented > both through its relationships with the classes of the Level One > ontol-ogy, and through it’s relationships with the classes in the Level > Two ontology. Finally, the attendees will be given a brief status report > outlining the progress of the OASIS EbXML Registry / Repository Semantic > Content Management SC effort focused on enabling the creation of a > repository of ontologies. De-scriptions provided include how such a > repository would facilitate ontology discovery and encourage reuse across > enterprises. Plus, how the logical con-sistency of ontologies can be > checked with a reasoner, and implicit knowledge can be inferred for these > ontologies using queries employing semantic terms > > <quote who="Chiusano Joseph"> > > Just a friendly reminder that the deadline for abstracts > > (non-late-breaking) for XML 2004 is tomorrow, Fri., 5/7/04. > > > >> Here are some ideas we been considering recently in various forums: > >> > >> -Semantic Content Management Using ebXML Registry (present work of the > >> SCM SC, Carl Mattocks, Farrukh, ....) > >> Carl, please confirm if you can take ownership of this? > >> > >> -Vocabulary Management Using ebXML Registry (present the work of the UK > >> egov pilot, Paul Spencer, Farrukh, Duane, ....) > >> Duane, please confirm if you can take ownership of this per our > >> discussions at Amsterdam? > > > > -- > Carl Mattocks > > co-Chair OASIS (ISO/TS 15000) ebXMLRegistry Semantic Content SC > co-Chair OASIS Business Centric Methodology TC > CEO CHECKMi > v/f (usa) 908 322 8715 > www.CHECKMi.com > Semantically Smart Compendiums > (AOL) IM CarlCHECKMi > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/leave_workgroup.php. -- Kind Regards, Joseph Chiusano Associate Booz | Allen | Hamilton
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]