Re: [regrep] ACORD Repository Standard

[David RR Webber <david@drrw.info>]

Some people like those old black and white movies.

; -)

DW

Quoting Farrukh Najmi <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM>:

> David RR Webber wrote:
> 
> >Farrukh,
> >
> >The issue appears to be that IBM is running the show at ACORD so
> >they are hardly likely to encourage anything remotely relating to
> >ebXML any year soon.
> >  
> >
> Oh well. That would be ACORD's loss I guess ;-)
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> Farrukh
> 
> 
> >DW.
> >
> >----- Original Message ----- 
> >From: "Farrukh Najmi" <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM>
> >To: "Peter Kacandes" <pkacande@adobe.com>
> >Cc: "ebXML Regrep (ebXML Regrep)" <regrep@lists.oasis-open.org>
> >Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 6:19 PM
> >Subject: Re: [regrep] ACORD Repository Standard
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> >>Peter Kacandes wrote:
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >>>fyi
> >>>
> >>>I received the ACORD newsletter today, and it had an interesting item
> >>>      
> >>>
> >about
> >  
> >
> >>>a document repository standard that they had recently approved. (ACORD is
> >>>      
> >>>
> >an
> >  
> >
> >>>insurance industry standards organization.
> >>>
> >>>I thought you might find it interesting:
> >>>http://www.acord.org/News/NewsDetail.aspx?Type=1&aid=1170
> >>>
> >>>Apparently, they also have a "Repository Interoperability Pilot Project"
> >>>      
> >>>
> >in
> >  
> >
> >>>progress.
> >>>
> >>>I've attached a copy of the project plan.
> >>>
> >>>Perhaps we might want to suggest that they should consider testing if
> >>>      
> >>>
> >their
> >  
> >
> >>>repository can interoperate with other registry/repository standards.
> >>>
> >>>cheers
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>It seems that all the functions they have identified are fulfilled by
> >>ebXML Registry already.
> >>
> >>Maybe some day in the future the ACORD participants will decide that it
> >>may be much easier
> >>if they endorsed and adopted a common Registry and Repository standard
> >>instead of defining
> >>messages that glue disparate standards together. The former being a long
> >>term strategy and the later
> >>being a tactical solution IMHO.
> >>
> >>It should be noted the standards based approach is the way that HL7,
> >>IHE, Open GIS and other
> >>verticals have gone about it.
> >>
> >>If you have any contacts in ACORD please find out if they would like to
> >>learn about what we have to offer.
> >>Most current and quickest way to communicate this is:
> >>
> >>[6] Web Content Management using ebXML Registry (XML Europe 2003):
> >>
> >>
> >>    
> >>
>
>http://ebxmlrr.sourceforge.net/presentations/xmlEurope2004/xmlEurope2004-webcm-ebxmlrr.ppt
> >  
> >
> >>    
> >>
>
>http://ebxmlrr.sourceforge.net/presentations/xmlEurope2004/xmlEurope2004-webcm-ebxmlrr.sxi
> >  
> >
> >>http://ebxmlrr.sourceforge.net/presentations/xmlEurope2004/04-02-02.pdf
> >>
> >>Thanks.
> >>
> >>-- 
> >>Regards,
> >>Farrukh
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of
> >>    
> >>
> >the OASIS TC), go to
>
>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/leave_workgroup.php.
> >  
> >
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 


http://drrw.net