[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [regrep] Impact of ICG Adoption on CCRIM SC (Was: [regrep]UN/CEFACT-ICG adopts freebXML Registry)
I actually also suggested this to Mark Crawford and others when I was in DC. I think it makes sense. Before we do this, I would like to wrap the work up slightly. The easiest way to do this is to change the title to something like "Recommendations to UN/CEFACT for storage of Core Components in an ebXML Registry/Repository" and then approve it as a best practices document within the TC. I am not sure what process we, as a TC, need to go through to approve this as a non normative document. Kathryn? Duane Farrukh Najmi wrote: > One important thing I did not mention is that UN/CEFACT is now doing > two things as part of their ICG Architecture: > > 1. Define a normative expression syntax in XML for Core Components > > 2. Define a normative mapping from CCTS Information Model to ebXML > Registry Information Model > > These were 2 important specification that SHOULD have been done by > CCTS but since they were not we chartered CCRIM SC to do these. > Now that UN/CEFACT teams are committed to doing this work I propose > that the CCTS team donate their current work-in-progress as input > (along with any recommendations) to the UN/CEFACT ICG and CCTS teams > and recharter to become the liaison and consultant to those teams as > they define and finalize these two tasks. > > Duane and others colleagues. What do you think of this idea? >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]