OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

regrep message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [regrep] Impact of ICG Adoption on CCRIM SC (Was: [regrep]UN/CEFACT-ICG adopts freebXML Registry)


I actually also suggested this to Mark Crawford and others when I was in 
DC.  I think it makes sense.

Before we do this, I would like to wrap the work up slightly.  The 
easiest way to do this is to change the title to something like 
"Recommendations to UN/CEFACT for storage of Core Components in an ebXML 
Registry/Repository" and then approve it as a best practices document 
within the TC.

I am not sure what process we, as a TC, need to go through to approve 
this as a non normative document.

Kathryn?

Duane

Farrukh Najmi wrote:

> One important thing I did not mention is that UN/CEFACT is now doing 
> two things as part of their ICG Architecture:
>
> 1. Define a normative expression syntax in XML for Core Components
>
> 2. Define a normative mapping from CCTS Information Model to ebXML 
> Registry Information Model
>
> These were 2 important specification that SHOULD have been done by 
> CCTS but since they were not we chartered CCRIM SC to do these.
> Now that UN/CEFACT teams are committed to doing this work I propose 
> that the CCTS team donate their current work-in-progress as input 
> (along with any recommendations) to the UN/CEFACT ICG and CCTS teams 
> and recharter to become the liaison and consultant to those teams as 
> they define and finalize these two tasks.
>
> Duane and others colleagues. What do you think of this idea?
>


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]