OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

regrep message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: RE: [regrep] Impact of ICG Adoption on CCRIM SC (Was: [regrep]UN/CEFACT-ICG adopts freebXML Registry)

We can approve it as a committee approved document.  Basic steps are:

1. Present the document at one of our telecons (just an overview/intro)
2. TC reviews for 2 weeks, sends comments
3. Comments are resolved
4. At the next telecon, TC agrees to vote on the document as a best
practices paper
5. Two week ballot is set up by TC Chair for TC voting
6. If TC approves, the document becomes a TC approved document, and is
posted for public view.

Let me know when you feel it is ready to present and I will add it to
the agenda.


-----Original Message-----
From: Duane Nickull [mailto:dnickull@adobe.com] 
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2004 8:49 AM
Cc: regrep@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [regrep] Impact of ICG Adoption on CCRIM SC (Was:
[regrep]UN/CEFACT-ICG adopts freebXML Registry)

I actually also suggested this to Mark Crawford and others when I was in

DC.  I think it makes sense.

Before we do this, I would like to wrap the work up slightly.  The 
easiest way to do this is to change the title to something like 
"Recommendations to UN/CEFACT for storage of Core Components in an ebXML

Registry/Repository" and then approve it as a best practices document 
within the TC.

I am not sure what process we, as a TC, need to go through to approve 
this as a non normative document.



Farrukh Najmi wrote:

> One important thing I did not mention is that UN/CEFACT is now doing
> two things as part of their ICG Architecture:
> 1. Define a normative expression syntax in XML for Core Components
> 2. Define a normative mapping from CCTS Information Model to ebXML
> Registry Information Model
> These were 2 important specification that SHOULD have been done by
> CCTS but since they were not we chartered CCRIM SC to do these.
> Now that UN/CEFACT teams are committed to doing this work I propose 
> that the CCTS team donate their current work-in-progress as input 
> (along with any recommendations) to the UN/CEFACT ICG and CCTS teams 
> and recharter to become the liaison and consultant to those teams as 
> they define and finalize these two tasks.
> Duane and others colleagues. What do you think of this idea?

To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of
the OASIS TC), go to

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]