[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [regrep] Impact of ICG Adoption on CCRIM SC (Was:[regrep]UN/CEFACT-ICG adopts freebXML Registry)
Kathryn: I have cc'd some of the UN/CEFACT folks. I will present this document during our next telecon so we can kick off the process. I would like to have the one review before we publich this. In the meantime, I will retitle the document "Recommendations to UN/CEFACT for the storage of Core Components and BIE's in an ebXML Registry-Repository". They will then be able to absorb whatever parts of it into their work they need to. Duane Breininger, Kathryn R wrote: >We can approve it as a committee approved document. Basic steps are: > >1. Present the document at one of our telecons (just an overview/intro) >2. TC reviews for 2 weeks, sends comments >3. Comments are resolved >4. At the next telecon, TC agrees to vote on the document as a best >practices paper >5. Two week ballot is set up by TC Chair for TC voting >6. If TC approves, the document becomes a TC approved document, and is >posted for public view. > >Let me know when you feel it is ready to present and I will add it to >the agenda. > >Thanks, >Kathryn. > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Duane Nickull [mailto:dnickull@adobe.com] >Sent: Monday, September 20, 2004 8:49 AM >Cc: regrep@lists.oasis-open.org >Subject: Re: [regrep] Impact of ICG Adoption on CCRIM SC (Was: >[regrep]UN/CEFACT-ICG adopts freebXML Registry) > > >I actually also suggested this to Mark Crawford and others when I was in > >DC. I think it makes sense. > >Before we do this, I would like to wrap the work up slightly. The >easiest way to do this is to change the title to something like >"Recommendations to UN/CEFACT for storage of Core Components in an ebXML > >Registry/Repository" and then approve it as a best practices document >within the TC. > >I am not sure what process we, as a TC, need to go through to approve >this as a non normative document. > >Kathryn? > >Duane > >Farrukh Najmi wrote: > > > >>One important thing I did not mention is that UN/CEFACT is now doing >>two things as part of their ICG Architecture: >> >>1. Define a normative expression syntax in XML for Core Components >> >>2. Define a normative mapping from CCTS Information Model to ebXML >>Registry Information Model >> >>These were 2 important specification that SHOULD have been done by >>CCTS but since they were not we chartered CCRIM SC to do these. >>Now that UN/CEFACT teams are committed to doing this work I propose >>that the CCTS team donate their current work-in-progress as input >>(along with any recommendations) to the UN/CEFACT ICG and CCTS teams >>and recharter to become the liaison and consultant to those teams as >>they define and finalize these two tasks. >> >>Duane and others colleagues. What do you think of this idea? >> >> >> > >To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of >the OASIS TC), go to >http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/leave_workgr >oup.php. > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]