[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [regrep] FW: IECM Standards Proposal
Group: Mike Connor from Adobe has agreed to take on this "synchronization" task. Thanks, Matt On Oct 20, 2004, at 2:40 PM, Chiusano Joseph wrote: > I would be happy to help sync this activity as Farrukh mentions below - > having said that, I wonder if our Adobe members (Peter, Duane, Matt) > are > the best folks to do this since Mike Connor of Adobe is helping lead > it. > Thoughts? > > The joint xmlCoP/SICoP (Semantic Interop CoP) meeting yesterday that > Owen refers to was attended by Carl, myself, and Ed Chase. At lunch, > Roy > Morgan of NIST lead an information discussion on registries - i.e. what > would the user community look for in a federal XML registry (or set of > federated registries). Carl contributed information regarding SCM, and > I > contributed a brief overview of registry standards - 11179, UDDI, and > ours - and the similarities/differences between them, as well as the > types of information that one would register in a registry (all verbal > contributions). > > Cheers, > Joe > > Booz Allen Hamilton > Strategy and Technology Consultants to the World > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Carl Mattocks [mailto:carlmattocks@checkmi.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 1:54 PM >> To: Farrukh Najmi >> Cc: Chiusano Joseph; regrep@lists.oasis-open.org >> Subject: Re: [regrep] FW: IECM Standards Proposal >> >> I talked privately with the principals involved in the >> initiative ... they are very much aware of the potential >> ebXMl Registry offers. Indeed, they acknowledged that the >> presentation produced by Farrukh for Europe XML was very >> prominent in their thinking. It was also agreed that Content >> Management included info about legacy systems.. >> >> I suggest that it is now time for the RegRep TC to explicitly >> declare our intent of supporting Content Management beyond >> XML artifacts. >> >> carl >> >> <quote who="Farrukh Najmi"> >>> ebXML Registry standard should be factored into any Content >> Management >>> standards activity. I have always maintained that Content (and >>> Metadata) Management is our core value. Can you explore what can be >>> done to sync these activities with Owen and others? Thanks. >>> >>> Chiusano Joseph wrote: >>> >>>> Forwarding this message from Owen Ambur, Co-Chair of the XML.gov >>>> Working Group. It refers to the crafting of "a conceptual >> proposal for >>>> specification of an international standard for Interoperable >>>> Enterprise Content Management (IECM)" within AIIM, an >> effort lead by >>>> Paul Fontaine of US Department of Transportation (DOT) and >> Mike Connor of Adobe. >>>> >>>> Is anyone else on our TC (besides Duane, Matt, and Ed >> Chase) aware of >>>> this effort? Can/should we factor ebXML Registry in? >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Joe >>>> >>>> Booz Allen Hamilton >>>> Strategy and Technology Consultants to the World >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Owen_Ambur@ios.doi.gov [mailto:Owen_Ambur@ios.doi.gov] >>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 1:17 PM >>>> To: Paul.Fontaine@ost.dot.gov; miconnor@adobe.com >>>> Cc: bfanning@aiim.org; dennis.hamilton@acm.org; >> jtsprehe@jtsprehe.com; >>>> sheila.campbell@gsa.gov; Thomas_McClay@ios.doi.gov; >>>> tbyrne@cmswatch.com; ejw@cse.ucsc.edu; bmanago@mdy.com; >>>> Jon.Barrett@Tally.Hummingbird.com; >>>> julian.reschke@gmx.de; gstein@lyra.org; qdaly@xythos.com; >>>> GOConnell@PureEdge.com; richards.john-a@epamail.epa.gov; >>>> odonnell.chris@epa.gov; Edwin_McCeney@ios.doi.gov; >>>> Maewyn.Cumming@cabinet-office.gsi.gov.uk; >>>> John.Borras@e-Envoy.gsi.gov.uk; karl.best@oasis-open.org; >>>> Diane.Lewis@nhtsa.dot.gov; Ted_Weir@blm.gov; >> Michael.Daconta@dhs.gov; >>>> Niemann.Brand@epamail.epa.gov; susan.turnbull@gsa.gov; >> Chiusano Joseph >>>> Subject: IECM Standards Proposal >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Paul & Mike, thanks a bunch for taking the lead in crafting a >>>> conceptual proposal for specification of an international >> standard for >>>> Interoperable Enterprise Content Management (IECM)! >>>> >>>> Such an effort would be a natural extension of AIIM's >> technical report >>>> on document and records management functions: ANSI/AIIM TR48-2004, >>>> Framework for the Integration of Electronic Document Management >>>> Systems and Electronic Records Management Systems. >>>> http://www.aiim.org/standards.asp?ID=24484 (That group, in which I >>>> participated, made a conscious decision to *exclude* >> consideration of >>>> "content" management as a matter of manageable scope.) >>>> >>>> It could also build upon and "modernize" the efforts of the >> Document >>>> Management Alliance (DMA), including the ODMA standard, taking into >>>> account the evolution of the Web, XML, and component-based, service >>>> oriented architecture. See http://www.infonuovo.com/dma/ & >>>> http://www.infonuovo.com/odma/ & >>>> http://nfocentrale.net/NuovoDoc/info/deh-sketch.htm >>>> >>>> It could be considered an extension to the WebDAV standard and DASL. >>>> See http://www.ics.uci.edu/~ejw/authoring/ & >> http://www.webdav.org/ & >>>> http://www.webdav.org/dasl/ >>>> >>>> As you have outlined the problem/opportunity, XForms could also be >>>> implicated. http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/ Certainly, >> "forms" are >>>> just another kind of document/record/content that needs to >> be managed. >>>> For example, the core set of metadata required to manage >> forms may be >>>> the same as for any other document/record. >>>> >>>> However, as I indicated at the joint xmlCoP/SICoP meeting >> yesterday, I >>>> encourage you to scope the effort to encompass work that can be >>>> reasonably accomplished in a relatively short period of >> time, e.g., 6 >>>> months. >>>> Ideally, one result would be to flesh out the >> document/records/content >>>> management elements of the Federal Enterprise Architecture (FEA) >>>> Service Component Reference Model (SRM), Data and Information >>>> Reference Model (DRM), and Technical Reference Model (TRM). In >>>> particular, I believe the time is ripe for specification of >> a core set >>>> of XML metadata elements to facilitate the discovery and >> management of >>>> documents/records/content on the Web. >>>> >>>> The bottom line is that I will be *delighted* to support this >>>> initiative in any way that I can, particularly with respect >> to the XML >>>> related aspects. >>>> >>>> Owen Ambur, Co-Chair >>>> xmlCoP http://xml.gov/ >>>> >>>> BTW, here is the agenda that was postponed due to the >> events of 9/11: >>>> http://xml.gov/agenda/20010919old.htm >>>> >>>> >>>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from >> the roster >>>> of the OASIS TC), go to >>>> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/ >> leave_workgroup.php. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> Farrukh >>> >>> >>> >>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from >> the roster >>> of the OASIS TC), go to >>> >> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/le >> ave_workgroup.php. >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Carl Mattocks >> >> co-Chair OASIS (ISO/TS 15000) ebXMLRegistry Semantic Content >> SC co-Chair OASIS Business Centric Methodology TC CEO CHECKMi >> v/f (usa) 908 322 8715 www.CHECKMi.com Semantically Smart Compendiums >> (AOL) IM CarlCHECKMi >> > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster > of the OASIS TC), go to > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/ > leave_workgroup.php. >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]