RE: [regrep] Rename RS to RP?

["BEDINI Ivan RD-BIZZ-CAE" <ivan.bedini@francetelecom.com>]

Matt, 
Is ebRS Federation better defined by 'service' or 'protocol' ?

Regards,
ivan

-----Message d'origine-----
De : Matthew MacKenzie [mailto:mattm@adobe.com] 
Envoyé : jeudi 21 octobre 2004 20:39
À : Richard Martell
Cc : Farrukh Najmi; BEDINI Ivan RD-BIZZ-CAE; regrep@lists.oasis-open.org; David RR Webber
Objet : Re: [regrep] Rename RS to RP?

ebR provides a set of services (QM, LM) that implement various high level protocols.  Therefore, "Service Protocol" does not actually work for our purposes.

Service Protocol would work if we were specifying a protocol for offering a service, so if ebXML Registry was implementing its own variant of HTTP, we could call that the ebXML Registry Service Protocol.

-Matt

On Oct 21, 2004, at 2:30 PM, Richard Martell wrote:

> Matthew MacKenzie wrote:
>
>> It rolls off the tongue, yes, but would not mean what we want it to 
>> mean.
>>
>> -Matt
>
> Hmm, perhaps this is the glossary entry you have in mind:
>
> <http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-gloss/#protocol>
>
> But then what exactly is the "Protocol"? There are several, no? HTTP, 
> SOAP, ebMS, etc.
>
>
> --
> Richard