[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [regrep] Final draft recommendations for CC's and Registry - UML/UMM Profile for CCTS
Duane, I would further add that using production rules from UML to generate CAM templates is also a smart option here. DW ----- Original Message ----- From: "Duane Nickull" <dnickull@adobe.com> To: "Anders W. Tell" <anderst@toolsmiths.se> Cc: "ebXML Regrep (ebXML Regrep)" <regrep@lists.oasis-open.org> Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 4:49 PM Subject: Re: [regrep] Final draft recommendations for CC's and Registry - UML/UMM Profile for CCTS > Anders: > > Sure - XMI probably is the best choice we have for model a interchange > format, but it is a lot larger than a comparable binary file would be > for storing persistent information about the same model. If you used > XMI exclusively, it would take up a lot more space on your users > machines and take a lot longer to parse, load. > > I think most of the UML tool vendors have it right -> they use binary > files and allow the users the chance to build and export XMI renditions. > > Duane > > Anders W. Tell wrote: > > > Duane Nickull wrote: > > > >> XMI would be notoriously innefficient as a storage mechanism for UML > >> projects. > > > > > > Could you elaborate on this ? Most UML tools use XMI based formats so > > it must be usable. What are your concerns? > > > > /anders > > > > -- > *********** > Senior Standards Strategist - Adobe Systems, Inc. - http://www.adobe.com > Vice Chair - UN/CEFACT Bureau Plenary - http://www.unece.org/cefact/ > Chair - OASIS eb SOA TC - http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=ebsoa > *********** > > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/leave_workgroup.php. > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]