[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [regrep] Standards approval process
Le lundi 17 janvier 2005 à 11:19 -0800, Duane Nickull a écrit : > Ivan: > > I disagree with your assertions. > > BEDINI Ivan RD-BIZZ-CAE wrote: > > > > >The goals : > >- to provide a definitively way to use an ebXML Registry to storing CCs. > > > > > DN - this is not hard to do. The registry does not care what the object > is. IMO - it is best to store as a complete object, not break it into > little tiny objects and slot them into RIM instances then reassemble > when you request them. Also - CC, ACC, BIE. ABIE should not be > dependent upon a registry in any way, shape or form. > Please Duane, give us your mapping and if it will well formed we will stop this discussion immediately :-P sincerely give us the possibility to have a little doubt about how you deal CC in your mapping. in the solution that you provide we can't distinguish a BBIE from an ACC. all is CC for you. > >- to define an API to submit, retrieve and find a set, or a single, CCs. > > > > > DN - that is what RSS is for. We should not define a separate API just > for CC related things. > Why not ?!? we choose ebXML Registry to store CC because it is a part of ebXML framework. so the less thing that I wait for by registry is that it could simply be able to retrieve a CC or that it provide us a simple way to do that. > >- to federate CCs between all existing registries. (future goal!) > > > > > DN -registry federation can do this. We do not need to make another > spec to do this. > Please share your experience with us. > The question you should ask your self is this > > "If someone sends me a core component, what will I get?" > > That is holding up adoption. > > Duane > regards, ivan
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]