[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [regrep] Standards approval process
Farrukh, +1. I just posted the link to the CAM / CCTS / Registry PPT I presented Friday. It's not intended to be all the answers, rather a snap-shot of where we stand today. While that teaches what runtime features are available - the fuzzy gray area is exactly how the coupling to the model and UML works - and that binding. The hooks are there on both ends - but connecting them up has not been fully developed yet. Hence my original message yesteday - I think we have the right parts in the box now, and we will solve these questions together this year in 2005. There is no quick fix - but steady design-make-test iterations here will get us their... We have to be careful to not build a Frankensteins Monster from those parts!! DW ----- Original Message ----- From: "Farrukh Najmi" <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM> To: <regrep@lists.oasis-open.org> Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 4:14 PM Subject: Re: [regrep] Standards approval process > BEDINI Ivan RD-BIZZ-CAE wrote: > > >I'm sorry but the mapping is not so simple: > >the better solution for ASCC and ASBIE is an ebRIM association or an > >extrinsic object ? > >do we need a dedicated registry object for BCC, BBIE, ASCC, ASBIE > >properties or an association is enough? > >Business Context will be a registry classification or an extrinsic > >object ? > > > > > I think Ivan touches on an important point above... That the fundemental > issue is the mapping between two information models: > > a) The CCTS Information Model (source model) > > b) The ebXML Registry Information Model (target model) > > Both models are defined in UML and a mapping between the two should be > the main focus. Such a mapping should be an abstract mapping that is > independent of > Serialization or Storage formats at least initialy. > > This whole debate about which comes first: Serialization format or > Storage format is not the core issue to debate IMHO. > > Instead we should be debating on the mapping issues between the two > models (see Iva's examles above) and using the ebXML Registry Tutorial: > > http://ebxmlrr.sourceforge.net/tmp/regrep-tutorial-draft-04.pdf > > as a key input when trying solution to mapping problems. > > BTW, is any one able to take Editorship of above document from me as I > have become a bottleneck on that document? Ivan, would you be interested > given that you and your colleagues have been using this document since > its earliest version and have some practical experience with its content? > > Thanks. > > > -- > Regards, > Farrukh > > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/leave_workgroup.php. > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]