OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

regrep message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Re: [regrep] Standards approval process



I just posted the link to the CAM / CCTS / Registry PPT
I presented Friday.  It's not intended to be all the answers,
rather a snap-shot of where we stand today.

While that teaches what runtime features are available - the
fuzzy gray area is exactly how the coupling to the model
and UML works - and that binding.  The hooks are there
on both ends - but connecting them up has not been
fully developed yet.

Hence my original message yesteday - I think we have
the right parts in the box now, and we will solve these
questions together this year in 2005.

There is no quick fix - but steady design-make-test
iterations here will get us their...  We have to be
careful to not build a Frankensteins Monster from
those parts!!


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Farrukh Najmi" <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM>
To: <regrep@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 4:14 PM
Subject: Re: [regrep] Standards approval process

> BEDINI Ivan RD-BIZZ-CAE wrote:
> >I'm sorry but the mapping is not so simple:
> >the better solution for ASCC and ASBIE is an ebRIM association or an
> >extrinsic object ?
> >do we need a dedicated registry object for BCC, BBIE, ASCC, ASBIE
> >properties or an association is enough?
> >Business Context will be a registry classification or an extrinsic
> >object ?
> >
> >
> I think Ivan touches on an important point above... That the fundemental
> issue is the mapping between two information models:
> a) The CCTS Information Model (source model)
> b) The ebXML Registry Information Model (target model)
> Both models are defined in UML and a mapping between the two should be
> the main focus. Such a mapping should be an abstract mapping that is
> independent of
> Serialization or Storage formats at least initialy.
> This whole debate about which comes first: Serialization format or
> Storage format is not the core issue to debate IMHO.
> Instead we should be debating on the mapping issues between the two
> models (see Iva's examles above) and using the ebXML Registry Tutorial:
>     http://ebxmlrr.sourceforge.net/tmp/regrep-tutorial-draft-04.pdf
> as a key input when trying solution to mapping problems.
> BTW, is any one able to take Editorship of above document from me as I
> have become a bottleneck on that document? Ivan, would you be interested
> given that you and your colleagues have been using this document since
> its earliest version and have some practical experience with its content?
> Thanks.
> -- 
> Regards,
> Farrukh
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of
the OASIS TC), go to

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]