[RIM Issue] Comments on Composed Object Definition

[Farrukh Najmi <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM>]

Farrukh Najmi wrote:

>
> Also comments on the following text would be appreciated but do so in 
> a separate thread titled "[RS Issue] Comments on Composed Object 
> Definition".

Oops. That should read:

Also comments on the following text would be appreciated but do so in a 
separate thread titled "[RIM Issue] Comments on Composed Object 
Definition".

>
> 2.5.2 Composed Object
>
> A RegistryObject instance MAY have instances of other RegistryObjects 
> and other classes composed within it as defined in this specification. 
> In such a relationship the composing object is refered to as the 
> /Composite/ object as defined in section 3.4 of [UML]. The composed 
> object is refered to in this document and other ebXML Registry 
> specification as /Composed/ object. The relationship between the 
> Composite and Composed object is refered as a composition relationship 
> as defined in section 3.4.8 of [UML].
>
BTW The [UML] reference is:
http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?formal/03-03-01 <http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath>

-- 
Regards,
Farrukh