[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Comments regarding UN/CEFACT Registry WD (0.5)
Hi all, Some comments regarding the latest working draft follow. * since the UN/CEFACT document is based on ebRS and extends it (workflow management, new content types, custom APIs, etc.), a more appropriate title might be something like this: "The UN/CEFACT profile of the OASIS ebXML Registry Service" * line 196: Change "feeding procedure" to "Submission procedure" (also title of section 5.2) * the conformance clause (2.4) is pretty weak--it should consolidate all conformance requirements in the document: e.g., - line 400 regarding federations; - line 811 regarding ebRIM mappings; - line 844 regarding packaging; - constraints listed in 6.4.1; - mandatory capabilities from 10.2 * will conformance testing be required in the future to verify the behavior of UN/CEFACT registry services? If so, then the inclusion of an abstract test suite may be warranted * in 184.108.40.206, perhaps substitute "Classification schemes" or "Dictionaries" for "Directories", since these items are all kinds of code lists and controlled vocabularies. Are these mapped to ebRIM classification schemes in some manner? (line 965 doesn't address this) -- Richard Martell Public PGP key: <http://www.galdosinc.com/pgp/> Galdos Systems, Inc. tel: +1 604-484-2765 | fax: +1 604-484-2755 Opinions, conclusions, recommendations, and other information presented in this message are not given or necessarily endorsed by my employer or firm. If the digital signature is invalid, I did not send this message.