[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [regrep] Whither ebRS conformance testing?
Breininger, Kathryn R wrote: >I believe that we may have an opportunity to work with OASIS to provide >additional visibility of ebXML implementations. I would like to see >these available through our TC site and/or an umbrella ebXML site in >OASIS. > > OASIS has no ability at present to host open source projects. Also IMO, the issue is really not one for the TC to decide but is entirely a private matter between project initiator (NIST) and whoeever they wish to collaborate with to do *their* open source project (hopefully freebXML.org). > >Kathryn Breininger >Boeing Library Services >425-965-0182 phone > > > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Farrukh Najmi [mailto:Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM] >Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 8:48 AM >To: Richard Martell >Cc: 'Michael Kass'; Breininger, Kathryn R; email@example.com >Subject: Re: [regrep] Whither ebRS conformance testing? > > >Richard Martell wrote: > > > >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: Michael Kass [mailto:michael.kass@NIST.GOV] >>>Sent: Wednesday, 04 May, 2005 08:03 >>>To: Breininger, Kathryn R; Farrukh Najmi; Richard Martell >>>Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org >>>Subject: Re: [regrep] Whither ebRS conformance testing? >>> >>>Kathryn, >>> >>> We (NIST) did a small set of tests for ebRS 2.1. We realized that >>> >>> > > > >>>3.0 was the target, but just wanted a proof of concept of the >>>Test Framework >>>1.1, and we had the 2.1 ebXML registry available to test against. >>> >>> NIST will not be generating any new tests for any ebXML >>>technologies (MS, Registry, BP). Any new tests or test requirements >>>will have to be >>>generated by OASIS TC members. >>> >>> The POC ebXML Test Framework implementation is freely available >>>for anyone to use, extend and write tests for. Please note that >>>it is not yet >>>complete. Many functions defined in the ebXML Test Framework v1.1. >>>specification are not implemented in our POC. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>Farrukh, >> >>Would the existing NIST implementation of the ebXML test framework be a >> >> > > > >>candidate for inclusion as a new freebXML project? >> >> >> >> >> >If it is an ebXML related project which sounds like it is and if it can >be available on a royalty free basis then it is a good candidate for >inclusion in freebXML.org projects. I would support this very >strongly because the more we can get RF ebXML projects >under one umbrella (freebXML.org) the more critical mass we have and the > >more cohesive the community of users and developers. > >Thanks for the excellent suggestion. Mike is this idea something that >you would consider? Thanks. > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that >generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS >at: >https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php > > >
begin:vcard fn:Farrukh Najmi n:Najmi;Farrukh email;internet:email@example.com tel;work:781-442-9017 url:http://ebxmlrr.sourceforge.net/tmp/DSCN0278.JPG version:2.1 end:vcard