RE: [regrep] Whence ebXML Registry?

[John Gillerman <john.gillerman@sisconet.com>]

Farrukh,

I think that they are looking for an alarming web service not a web service
infrastructure.  To my knowledge ebXML does not define a model for alarm
management.  Presumably, once the alarming services is defined the service
would be registered in an ebXML registry and the semantics of what a
specific alarm means (the ontology related to the network of sensors) could
be store in a semantically enabled ebXML registry as well.  However, given
the complexity of the ontology related to a sensor network, it's description
would best be accomplished via a OWL enabled registry.

Regards,

John Gillerman
SISCO
www.sisconet.com
T: 732 937-9745
F: 775-667-0355
M: 732 979-9595 

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Farrukh Najmi [mailto:Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM] 
> Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2005 9:53 AM
> To: Richard Martell
> Cc: regrep@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: [regrep] Whence ebXML Registry?
> 
> Hi Richard,
> 
> I was excited to see the following but then disappointed that 
> somehow ebXML Registry did not get mentioned.
> Any idea why? Can you found out if this can be fixed in this 
> link below? 
> Thanks.
> 
> http://www.gisuser.com/content/view/5665/
>