RE: [regrep] regrep 1/24/2007: Question on RS Section 3.1 Errata(PublicComment)

["Breininger, Kathryn R" <kathryn.r.breininger@boeing.com>]

Okay - between the comments Monica sent, the public comment, comments from Ivan, and from Farrukh, do we now have a consensus on how the text needs to be changed?  Although the vote on the two ballots was completed and both erratas were approved as Committee Drafts, it sounds like the RS errata needs to be re-worded and go through the process again.

Please let me know exactly what text needs to be changed for the issues Monica, public comment and Ivan brought up, and I will make changes and re-submit for the TC review and discussion at our next telecon (Feb. 8th) 

Thanks,
Kathryn

Kathryn Breininger
Boeing Library Services
425-965-0182 phone




-----Original Message-----
From: BEDINI Ivan RD-BIZZ-CAE [mailto:ivan.bedini@orange-ftgroup.com] 
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 8:38 AM
To: Farrukh S. Najmi
Cc: ebXML Regrep
Subject: RE: [regrep] regrep 1/24/2007: Question on RS Section 3.1 Errata(PublicComment)

Thanks Farrukh,
Sounds good to me.

--
Regards,
Ivan 

-----Message d'origine-----
De : Farrukh S. Najmi [mailto:farrukh@wellfleetsoftware.com]
Envoyé : jeudi 25 janvier 2007 17:11
À : BEDINI Ivan RD-BIZZ-CAE
Cc : ebXML Regrep
Objet : Re: [regrep] regrep 1/24/2007: Question on RS Section 3.1 Errata(PublicComment)

BEDINI Ivan RD-BIZZ-CAE wrote:
> Exactly,
> I agree with the latest modification.
>
> Another concern now is about the attribute LID definition, as follow:
> <ebRIM3.0_Section_2.5.6 Attribute lid> ...If the submitter assigns the 
> lid attribute, she must guarantee that it is a globally unique URN...
> </ebRIM3.0_Section_2.5.6 Attribute lid>
>
> This could seem inconsistent with the new text and not clear about the action to do. Not sure about what means *globally unique*. 
> If my interpretation is correct, in reality it is not so because physically two differents UUID imply two diferents RegistryObjects (R01 and RO2) with the same LID => the LID is not globally unique. 
> What must be guaranteed is that in this case => Twoor more RO with the 
> same LID must have (at least) a different version number (i.e. for the 
> same LID => RO1 version must be different from RO2 version)
>
>   

The complete text says:

"The lid attribute MAY be specified by the submitter when creating the original version of a RegistryObject. If the submitter assigns the lid attribute, she must guarantee that it is a globally unique URN."

The text applies to specifying lid when submitting the "original version of a RegistryObject". In this case it MUST be globally unique.

Perhaps a clarity could be:


"The lid attribute MAY be specified by the submitter when creating the original version of a RegistryObject. If the submitter assigns the lid attribute *when submitting the original version of a RegistryObject*, she must guarantee that it is a globally unique URN."


--
Regards,
Farrukh

Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com