Re: [regrep] regrep 1/24/2007: Question on RS Section 3.1Errata(PublicComment)

["Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>]

Farrukh S. Najmi wrote:

>Breininger, Kathryn R wrote:
>  
>
>> 
>>It seems we discussed this before Christmas, and that there was some
>>issue with changing a wsdl... Maybe I am thinking of something else...
>>  
>>    
>>
>
>I cannot recall for sure but you may be right. Do you think we should
>ask OASIS about rules fixing an obvious copy/paste
>error like this. I mean how can a Request message return a response that
>is a Request message of same type? Not likely
>hardly ever - right?
>  
>
mm1: As noted previously, the TC decides whether the change is 
substantive or editorial. Thanks. :>)