RE: [regrep] We had more business to conduct this morning!

["Breininger, Kathryn R" <kathryn.r.breininger@boeing.com>]

More administration, from the voting rules
(<http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process.php#2.13>):
-------------------------------------------
"Electronic Voting: TCs may conduct electronic ballots, either by using
the TC's general mail list or the publicly archived electronic voting
functionality provided by OASIS. The minimum period allowed for
electronic voting shall be seven calendar days; the TC may specify a
longer voting period for a particular electronic ballot. Any
Specification Ballot conducted as an electronic ballot must permit each
voter to choose "yes", "no" or "abstain." 

A motion to open an electronic ballot must be made in a TC meeting
unless the TC has adopted a standing rule to allow this motion to be
made on the TC's general email list. When such a rule has been adopted,
motions made on the mail list must also be seconded and discussed on
that list."
---------------------------------------------------
So, even if we conduct the vote via e-mail, the minimum period allowed
is 7 calendar days.  

We still need the electronic motion, second and discussion....  Then I
can send out electronic ballots, or use Kavi ballots (either one has to
be set for 7 calendar days).

Sorry this is a bit confusing and detailed. These things were put into
place to help us make the best specs and have a totally open process.  

Kathryn Breininger
Boeing Library Services
425-965-0182 phone




-----Original Message-----
From: Farrukh S. Najmi [mailto:farrukh@wellfleetsoftware.com] 
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 2:57 PM
To: Breininger, Kathryn R
Cc: ebXML Regrep
Subject: Re: [regrep] We had more business to conduct this morning!

Breininger, Kathryn R wrote:
> I was reviewing the TC processes and discovered that we needed to 
> conduct a little more business with the erratas!  I would like to 
> propose that we do this via e-mail, if possible. Below is what we 
> needed to do (sorry - my fault for not having it in front of me this
morning!).
>
>
> We did item (a) this morning.  We need to confirm by full majority 
> vote that the proposed corrections do not constitute a substantive 
> change (item b), and then we need to agree to submit the proposed 
> erratas for a 15-day public review (item c).
>
> Could we have a brief discussion via e-mail, and if agreeable, would 
> you like me to set up electronic votes in Kavi for items b and c? 
> (this would be a total of 4 ballots, two for each errata).
>
> Please respond with agreement, suggestions, or discussion!
>
>   

Dear colleagues,

I agree on the record that the RIM *and* RS errata do not constitute a
substantive change (item b) and that we should to submit the proposed
erratas for a 15-day public review (item c).

I thought we had voted to conducted ballots via email for the TC. Can we
do that instead of KAVI?
If so I vote Yes on all 4 ballots.

1. I agree that the RIM errata do not constitute a substantive change 2.
I agree that the RS errata do not constitute a substantive change 3. I
agree that the RIM errata be submitted for a 15-day public review 4. I
agree that the RS errata be submitted for a 15-day public review

Thank you.


--
Regards,
Farrukh

Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com