Re: [regrep] We had more business to conduct this morning!

[BEDINI Ivan RD-BIZZ-CAE <ivan.bedini@orange-ftgroup.com>]

+1 for ballots via email.

And I vote Yes on all 4 ballots.

1. I agree that the RIM errata do not constitute a substantive change
2. I agree that the RS errata do not constitute a substantive change
3. I agree that the RIM errata be submitted for a 15-day public review
4. I agree that the RS errata be submitted for a 15-day public review

Le jeudi 22 février 2007 à 17:56 -0500, Farrukh S. Najmi a écrit :
> If so I vote Yes on all 4 ballots.
> 
> 1. I agree that the RIM errata do not constitute a substantive change
> 2. I agree that the RS errata do not constitute a substantive change
> 3. I agree that the RIM errata be submitted for a 15-day public review
> 4. I agree that the RS errata be submitted for a 15-day public review