Re: [regrep] We had more business to conduct this morning!

["Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>]

mm1 Too! 
+1 for ballots via email.

And I vote Yes on all 4 ballots.

1. I agree that the RIM errata do not constitute a substantive change
2. I agree that the RS errata do not constitute a substantive change
3. I agree that the RIM errata be submitted for a 15-day public review
4. I agree that the RS errata be submitted for a 15-day public review

Le jeudi 22 février 2007 à 17:56 -0500, Farrukh S. Najmi a écrit :

>> If so I vote Yes on all 4 ballots.
>> 
>> 1. I agree that the RIM errata do not constitute a substantive change
>> 2. I agree that the RS errata do not constitute a substantive change
>> 3. I agree that the RIM errata be submitted for a 15-day public review
>> 4. I agree that the RS errata be submitted for a 15-day public review
>  
>