RE: Advancing OWL Profile document to Committee Specification

["Breininger, Kathryn R" <kathryn.r.breininger@boeing.com>]

Mary,
We have also been working on our errata documents for the RIM and the
RS.  We are including a reference link to the RIM and RS OASIS Standards
as versions 3.0.1 which show the differences.  I assume that the
versions 3.0.1 should remain exactly as the version 3.0 standards, with
the change bars on showing where the missing figures were inserted, etc.
My question then is, do the errata documents need to conform to the new
templates, or do they continue to conform to the existing approved
version 3.0 documents for which they are the erratas?  We are currently
in an electronic vote to submit them for the 15 day public review.

Thanks for your help on this confusing issue!
Kathryn



Kathryn Breininger
Boeing Library Services
425-965-0182 phone




-----Original Message-----
From: Mary McRae [mailto:mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org] 
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 8:56 AM
To: Breininger, Kathryn R; jamie.clark@oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: Advancing OWL Profile document to Committee Specification

Hi Kathryn,

  Yes, any document that is not yet a Committee Specification must
conform to the templates. I think the OWL Profile is in decent shape,
but note particularly that the TC transitioned to RF on Limited Terms
effective 12 February and therefore the new document will need to have
the 4-15-05 Notices section rather than the legacy Notices section now
in place. We'll also need to get the current HTML transformed into valid
and correct XHTML. Once you've gotten the source spec up to date I can
provide assistance on the XHTML.

Regards,

Mary 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Breininger, Kathryn R [mailto:kathryn.r.breininger@boeing.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 11:38 AM
> To: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org; jamie.clark@oasis-open.org
> Subject: Advancing OWL Profile document to Committee Specification
> 
> Hi Mary and Jamie,
> The OWL Profile document has completed its 60 day public review, with 
> no comments.  The ebXML Registry TC approved a motion to advance the 
> OWL Profile document to Committee Specification, and also to submit it

> to the OASIS membership for consideration as an OASIS standard.  We 
> are working on the submission package currently, but in the meantime, 
> would you please set up the ballot for approving as a Committee 
> Specification?
> 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/download.p
> hp/21418/e
> bXMLRegProfileOWL.zip
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/download.p
> hp/21417/r
> egrep-owl-profile-v1.5-cd01.pdf
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/download.p
> hp/21416/r
> egrep-owl-profile-v1.5-cd01.odt
> 
> Attached are the minutes from our meeting showing the voting results:
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/email/arch
> ives/20070
> 2/msg00052.html
> 
> Also, this document was already in the process and on track for 
> standards submission, so my understanding is that we do not need to 
> redo it to the latest template - is that correct?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> 
> Kathryn Breininger
> CENTRAL Project Manager
> Emerging Technologies
> Boeing Library Services
> 
> 425-965-0182 phone
> 425-237-3491 fax
> kathryn.r.breininger@boeing.com
> 
> > How was your service? Please click link below.......
> > http://socal.web.boeing.com/ssglibsurvey/
> > 
> >