OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

regrep message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: RE: [regrep] Should IBM being working with us on this?

Maybe what we need to do instead is more marketing of ebXML registry repository, with lots of success stories!  The Webinar is a start in that direction!

Kathryn Breininger
Boeing Library Services
425-965-0182 phone


From: Carl Mattocks [mailto:cmattocks@metlife.com]
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 7:28 AM
To: Breininger, Kathryn R
Cc: David RR Webber (XML); Farrukh S. Najmi; regrep@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [regrep] Should IBM being working with us on this?

To help folks understand that SOA already has a Registry Repository standard we could modify the name to "SOA Registry & Repository"

Carl Mattocks
Consultant : ITIL  Application Knowledge Management
MetLife 732 893 4170

'Always look on the bright side of life' Monty Python

"Breininger, Kathryn R" <kathryn.r.breininger@boeing.com>

04/30/2007 09:59 AM

"Farrukh S. Najmi" <farrukh@wellfleetsoftware.com>, "David RR Webber (XML)" <david@drrw.info>
RE: [regrep] Should IBM being working with us on this?

I think we should keep the full name: ebXML Registry and Repository. We
are branded that way now, and dropping registry would drop an important
part of the standard.  I think it clearly says we have two things; a way
to register and a place to store, an important (and winning!)

Kathryn Breininger
Boeing Library Services
425-965-0182 phone

-----Original Message-----
From: Farrukh S. Najmi [mailto:farrukh@wellfleetsoftware.com]
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 6:50 AM
To: David RR Webber (XML)
Cc: regrep@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [regrep] Should IBM being working with us on this?

Hi David,

Thanks for sharing this interesting news.

The fact that UDDI does not meet the requirements of an industrial
strength repository is probably not a surprise many savvy folks in the
user community. After all, it was never designed for that purpose and in
fact does not even have a repository.

It would be good to have discussions with IBM colleagues to explore
their repository requirements and how well ebXML regrep meets their

BTW, I am guilty for suggesting that we drop the "and Repository" from
our original name "ebXMl Registry and Repository".
The rationale was that the name was a mouthful. In retrospect, I think a
better name that was not a mouthful would have been "ebXML Repository".

I wonder if it is possible and whether it makes sense for us to
officially change our name now. It would be a clear reminder that we are
very much a Repository standard as indicated in our TC name regrep.

What do TC members think?

David RR Webber (XML) wrote:
> FYI.  But the recent developments the past week on rr-dev on using
> OMAR with simpler GUI tools - maybe what IBM needs here? Sometimes a
> simple breakthrough can make all the difference in adoption...
> I would suggest some dialogue could be critical - especially given
> IBMs commit to regrep for IHE/XDS - aligning on the one secure
> registry base would be a power play for them...
> DW
> IBM Calls for New SOA Registry Standard Joe McKendrick, ZDNet Blog
> IBM spokespeople are saying that the UDDI standard for registries
> isn't cutting it, and the "time is now" for a new registry standard
> more focused on today's SOA realities. In the meantime, IBM will be
> offering a proprietary solution. In a new report in ITWeek, IBM
> managers state that SOAs have stretched the Universal Description,
> Discovery and Integration (UDDI) web services standard to the limit,
> and that it's time for a new standard.
> Burton Group's Anne Thomas Manes had just issued a report that IBM's
> WebSphere Service Registry and Repository
> (WSRR) 6.0.1 doesn't fully support UDDI, the commonly accepted
> standard behind SOA registries. IBM, however, says that UDDI was
> originally designed for Web services, which invoke point-to-point
> connections across the network. (In fact, it was designed to be the
"Yellow Pages"
> of the e-business world.)
> But what enterprises need now is a registry standard that addresses
> the building-block, enterprise approach of SOA, Big Blue says. SOAs
> require different information about services than do Web services, IBM

> claimed. According to Sunil Murthy, a manager for WebSphere Service
> Registry and Repository at IBM's Software Group, UDDI will not allow
> for role-based access to services, does not let companies manage a
> service's life cycle to enable governance, and does not allow for
> services to be searched. The IBM representatives quoted in the article

> could not predict what a new registry standard would or should look
> like, but said vendors should take their time in sorting things out.
> http://blogs.zdnet.com/service-oriented/?p=864
> See also Burton:
> http://searchwebservices.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid26
> _gci1252107,00.html
> "The way to be is to do" - Confucius (551-472 B.C.)


Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com

The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is for the intended addressee only.  Any unauthorized use, dissemination of the information, or copying of this message is prohibited.  If you are not the intended addressee, please notify the sender immediately and delete this message.

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]