RE: [regrep] Should IBM being working with us on this?

["Breininger, Kathryn R" <kathryn.r.breininger@boeing.com>]

Thanks Farrukh! 



Kathryn Breininger
Boeing Library Services
425-965-0182 phone




-----Original Message-----
From: Farrukh S. Najmi [mailto:farrukh@wellfleetsoftware.com] 
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 10:26 AM
To: David RR Webber (XML)
Cc: regrep@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [regrep] Should IBM being working with us on this?


My response to the blog may be found here:

<http://blogs.zdnet.com/service-oriented/5208-10536-0.html?forumID=1&thr
eadID=33251&messageID=610630&start=-1>

David RR Webber (XML) wrote:
> FYI.  But the recent developments the past week on rr-dev on using 
> OMAR with simpler GUI tools - maybe what IBM needs here? Sometimes a 
> simple breakthrough can make all the difference in adoption...
>  
> I would suggest some dialogue could be critical - especially given 
> IBMs commit to regrep for IHE/XDS - aligning on the one secure 
> registry base would be a power play for them...
>  
> DW
>  
> IBM Calls for New SOA Registry Standard Joe McKendrick, ZDNet Blog
>  
> IBM spokespeople are saying that the UDDI standard for registries 
> isn't cutting it, and the "time is now" for a new registry standard 
> more focused on today's SOA realities. In the meantime, IBM will be 
> offering a proprietary solution. In a new report in ITWeek, IBM 
> managers state that SOAs have stretched the Universal Description, 
> Discovery and Integration (UDDI) web services standard to the limit, 
> and that it's time for a new standard.
>  
> Burton Group's Anne Thomas Manes had just issued a report that IBM's 
> WebSphere Service Registry and Repository
> (WSRR) 6.0.1 doesn't fully support UDDI, the commonly accepted 
> standard behind SOA registries. IBM, however, says that UDDI was 
> originally designed for Web services, which invoke point-to-point 
> connections across the network. (In fact, it was designed to be the
"Yellow Pages"
> of the e-business world.)
>  
> But what enterprises need now is a registry standard that addresses 
> the building-block, enterprise approach of SOA, Big Blue says. SOAs 
> require different information about services than do Web services, IBM

> claimed. According to Sunil Murthy, a manager for WebSphere Service 
> Registry and Repository at IBM's Software Group, UDDI will not allow 
> for role-based access to services, does not let companies manage a 
> service's life cycle to enable governance, and does not allow for 
> services to be searched. The IBM representatives quoted in the article

> could not predict what a new registry standard would or should look 
> like, but said vendors should take their time in sorting things out.
> http://blogs.zdnet.com/service-oriented/?p=864
> See also Burton:
> http://searchwebservices.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid26
> _gci1252107,00.html
>
> "The way to be is to do" - Confucius (551-472 B.C.)


--
Regards,
Farrukh

Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com