OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

regrep message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [regrep] [regrep4] Align susbcription/notification with Web ServicesNotification(WSN)


RegRep 4 is a major release so backward compatibility is not required.
IMHO, our goal is to maximize backward compatibility but we do not need
to be absolutely backward compatible.

Breininger, Kathryn R wrote:
> What about backwards compatibility? 
>
>
>
> Kathryn Breininger
> Boeing Library Services
> 425-965-0182 phone
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Farrukh Najmi [mailto:farrukh@wellfleetsoftware.com] 
> Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 12:04 PM
> To: ebXML Regrep
> Subject: [regrep] [regrep4] Align susbcription/notification with Web
> Services Notification(WSN)
>
>
> Team,
>
> The WSN specs:
>
> <http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=wsn#technica
> l>
>
> are now approved as OASIS standard.
>
> I would like to propose that we align the subscription/notification
> feature in RegRep 4 with these specs. The changes would have the
> following high level implications:
>
>     * Eliminate several types and elements defined in rim.xsd
>     * Eliminate NotificationListener*.wsdl files
>     * RegRep implementations would need to implement or otherwise
>       provide the following interfaces defined in
>       <http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsn/bw-2.wsdl>:
>           o NotificationProducer
>           o PullPoint
>           o SubscriptionManager
>     * RegRep clients wishing to get notified would need to implement the
>       following interfaces defined in
>       <http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsn/bw-2.wsdl>:
>           o NotificationConsumer
>
> While this is a big change I think it makes sense to align with this
> standard because:
>
>     * Aligns us with an approved standard
>     * Reduces our spec content to possibly just profiling WSN specs
>     * Provides richer more extensible functionality than we currently
> have
>
> Please share your thoughts on this proposal.
>
> Thank you.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Farrukh
>
> Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com
>
>
>   


-- 
Regards,
Farrukh

Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com




[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]