[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [regrep] Issue-98: Need to specify association propogation semanticsfor versioning
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [regrep] Issue-98: Need to specify association propogation
semantics for versioning
From: Farrukh Najmi <farrukh@wellfleetsoftware.com>
Date: Tue, July 14, 2009 1:53 pm
To: ebXML Regrep <regrep@lists.oasis-open.org>
Farrukh Najmi wrote:
>
> Dear colleagues,
>
> Please discuss your thoughts on this issue and proposed resolution:
>
> <http://wxforge.wx.ll.mit.edu:8080/jira/browse/REGREPTC-98>
>
Having thought about this some more we need to narrow the semantics as
follows:
* When a RegistryPackage gets versioned, a server MUST propogate
members of the old version to the new version
* MUST a RegistryPackage member gets versioned it MUST replace the
older version as member within all RegistryPackages that have
"Draft" status
There are too many corner cases in association propagation so we need to
be very careful and tight in what we specify as propagation semantics.
Please think through this carefully and share comments.
--
Regards,
Farrukh
Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]