[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: 1 Standard multiple parts
A quick update...
I have started creating the changes for 1 Standard multiple parts decision from our last meeting.
Looking at the Open Office example (thanks Robin):
Originally I thought we would have 2 parts (ebRIM, ebRS) plus the mastre document.
I feel we need more than two parts as follows:
Also note the URLs behind the part links above. They are consistent with OpenOffice and also consistent with our specification bundle structure.
Are we all good with above multi-parts? Please respond right away to reduce downstream rework as I am actively working full-speed ahead on the specs.
On 03/03/2011 12:51 PM, Farrukh Najmi wrote:
4D6FD517.firstname.lastname@example.org" type="cite">...F410F57DEDDC0049ADEB2886CC15060B0166F6B7E8@XCH-NW-03V.nw.nos.boeing.com" type="cite">3. Discussion for v4.0 One multipart standard, or multiple standards.
-- Regards, Farrukh Najmi Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com