Subject: Re: [regrep] Re: [Urgent] What is our TC's formal name?
My revised question is:
Based on current formal TC name, what is the exact text that should be listed under Technical Committee: section of the title page of specs?
We have so much else to do for spec submission that I am inclined to not bother with TC name change at this point.
On 03/11/2011 01:28 PM, Robin Cover wrote:
AANLkTimUVsyJ+70CPHm0aN_G4uJWLApmU9yFB4Tdr_Tfirstname.lastname@example.org" type="cite">I'll need to check, but my guess is that a TC name change would require a TC ballot for charter clarification. -rcc PS As to the actual name of the TC, I guess that is largely up to the TC members, but I have personal sensibilities and recommendations about CamelCase in this naming context, which I may communicate off-list, after I think about "RegRep" a bit. Possibly apropos: In the early phases of XML, it was thought that the clever orthography "eXtensible Markup Language" would be a good idea. By most counts: it was not, for all the reasons that readily come to mind... On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Farrukh Najmi <email@example.com> wrote:Hi Guys, After 12 years or so of our existence I am embarrassed to ask this question but... I recall that long time ago we had voted to publicly change our TC's formal name to "OASIS ebXML RegRep TC". For some reason our TC public website says "OASIS ebXML Registry TC". Which is correct? I need this resolved ASAP for the spec submission to OASIS. Robin, do you have any comments?
-- Regards, Farrukh Najmi Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com