Re: [relax-ng-comment] conformance test

[Gary Stephenson <garys@ihug.com.au>]

Hi James,

> > Obviously, the same problem applies to many of the other restricitons
> also.
> >
> > Perhaps the definition of "descendant" in section 7.1. should be expanded
> to
> > explicitly state that the descendants of a ref element are in fact the
> > descendants of the corresponding define element.  I assume that is the
> > intent - yes?
>
> That's NOT the intent. Descendant means child or child of child or ...

OK. So presumably the  'element' should be changed to 'ref' under the list and
except-in-data sections also - yes?

many thanks,

gary