Re: exclusions

[James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>]

I don't think there's much point in discussing this in the abstract.  If
you (or anybody else) produce a concrete proposal for wholesale changes
to the TREX syntax, then the TC can certainly consider it.

David RR Webber wrote:
> 
> James,
> 
> How much latitude do we have here?
> 
> I'd like to explore some alternates for the overall structural model
> here.
> 
> One concern I have is overall readability and terseness, verse
> exactness of parsing and machine marsing context.
> 
> Some of the syntax structuring you have just does not yet
> 'feel right' mixture of asthetics and design metrics.
> 
> As ever I'm putting on my classroom instructor hat - and thinking
> how easy is this to teach?  And how easy is this for the average
> business data analyst to utilize for business transactions?
> 
> Anyone else thinking same?
> 
> Thanks, DW.