RE: PyTREX feature complete

[James Tauber <jtauber@bowstreet.com>]

Found the bug. Turned out to have nothing to do with the validation code. It
was simply a bug in the code that builds the in-memory representation of the
pattern.

James


> Thank you.
> 
> I'm working on this now. I'd hoped this would be same bug as 
> James Clark
> pointed out but it isn't.
> 
> James
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Murata Makoto [mailto:mura034@attglobal.net]
> > Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 8:17 AM
> > To: 'trex@lists.oasis-open.org'
> > Subject: Re: PyTREX feature complete
> > 
> > 
> > James Tauber wrote:
> > 
> > > I've just release PyTREX 0.7.0 at
> > > 
> > > 	http://sourceforge.net/projects/pytrex/
> > > 
> > > PyTREX now implements the entire TREX specification. There 
> > are a couple of
> > > known bugs and no anonymous types are supported but 
> > everything in the spec
> > > is implemented.
> > 
> > My bug report is available at:
> > 
> > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=41213
> > 0&group_id=21330&atid=371829
> > 
> > Content models of TREX handle both elements and attributes, 
> > thus representing 
> > interdepencies between attributes and elements very well.  
> > However, implementation 
> > is not as easy as it looks like.  Although I am sure that 
> > James Clark's implementation 
> > is correct, I would like to see correct implementations based 
> > on different algorithms.
> > 
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > 
> > Makoto
> > 
>