[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: unambiguity constraint
James Clark wrote: > > Is this basically "single type" extended so that name classes > > can be handled correctly? > > Don't understand the question. I call a tree regular grammar is "single type" if we can uniquely determine the type of an element or attribute from its name and type of its parent element. If we also take the types of elder sibling elements into consideration, we have a different class of grammars "restrained competition". In other words, "single type" is similar to XML Schema. Cheers, Makoto
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC