Re: Issue: overlapping with XML Schema Part 2

[Murata Makoto <mura034@attglobal.net>]

James Clark wrote:

> I believe the concept of restriction in XML Schema Part 2 is broken.  The
> only way of treating XML Schema Part 2 facets that I have been able to find
> that isn't broken is to treat them as parameters.  If facets are just
> parameters, what would derivation mean?

I agree that restriction in XML Schema Part 2 has problems.  You are not 
opposing to assigning a name to a datatype combined with some parameters.  Am 
I right?

James Clark wrote:

> <data type="xsd:int">
>    <choice>
>       <value>1</value>
>       <value>2</value>
>     </choice>
> </data>

Is this <choice> a constraint on value spaces (and then lexical spaces)?

Cheers,

Makoto