[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: Issue: shall we restrict subordinates of <oneOrMore>
James Clark wrote: > I would propose instead the following restriction (also in terms of the > normalized form): > > If a <oneOrMore> element has an <attribute> descendant, it must not have a > <group> or <interleave> descendant. This looks fine to me. Intuitively, this restriction allows (@att | elem | #data | EMPTY)+ only. It can be always decomposed into ( elem | #data | EMPTY)+ and (@att | EMPTY)+ . Thus, GNF normalization always works. Cheers, Makoto
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC