Re: Issue: shall we restrict subordinates of <oneOrMore>

[James Clark <jjc@thaiopensource.com>]

I agree with this.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI" <kohsuke.kawaguchi@eng.sun.com>
To: "TREX Discussion List" <trex@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 5:56 AM
Subject: Re: Issue: shall we restrict subordinates of <oneOrMore>


>
> > If a <oneOrMore> element has an <attribute> descendant, it must not have
a
> > <group> or <interleave> descendant.
>
> This prohibits
>
> <zeroOrMore>
>   <choice>
>     <attribute><anyName/></attribute>
>     <group>
>       <element/><element/>
>     </group>
>   </choice>
> </zeroOrMore>
>
> Which is somewhat artificial, but still harmless. So I would suggest
>
> If a <oneOrMore> element has an <attribute> descendant, there may not be
> any <group> or <interleave> between <oneOrMore> and <attribute>.
>
> In other words,
>
> If <group> or <interleave> is used under <oneOrMore>, then it cannot
> contain any <attribute>.
>
>
> --
> Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI                          +1 650 786 0721
> Sun Microsystems                   kohsuke.kawaguchi@eng.sun.com
>
>
>
>