[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: combine proposal
>Maybe there's an easy solution to this. Observe that in all cases where >combine="group" is allowed by this proposal, it has exactly the same >semantics as combine="interleave". So we could save ourselves a bunch of >complexity in the spec and in implementations without forgoing any >functionality just by getting rid of combine="group" altogether. Yes, this would work. >A grammar-level include would also need to be able to contain a <start> >element to replace any <start> element from the include. Yes. Cheers, Makoto
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC