RE: <div> in <include>

[Michael Fitzgerald <mike@wyeast.net>]

I wonder if this might go the same route as include and externalRef?

If div in grammar is not equal to div in include, could we have something
like div and scope or some other sensible, alternate name?

Perhaps the difference that was between, say, a grammar-level include and a
pattern-level include is more troublesome than the difference in a
grammar-level div and an include-level div.

What do others think...

-Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI [mailto:kohsuke.kawaguchi@eng.sun.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 8:50 AM
To: relax-ng@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: <div> in <include>



<div> elements are equally sensible for the <include> element.

<grammar>
    <include href="...">
        <div>
            <define name="foo">
                ...
            </define>
        </div>

        <define name="joe">
            ...
        </define>
    </include>

    ....
</grammar>


<div>s inside a <grammar> element and <div>s inside a <include> element
is not equal, for example because the former is allowed to have a <start>
element where the latter isn't.


In RELAX Core, we have similar situation. We have <div> inside
<interface> and <div> inside <module>.


--
Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI                          +1 650 786 0721
Sun Microsystems                   kohsuke.kawaguchi@sun.com


------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
"unsubscribe" in the body to: relax-ng-request@lists.oasis-open.org