[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: Issue: shall we rename the name attribute?
James Clark wrote: > What you are proposing is that the > "pattern" attribute be used to specify not the component that is a pattern > but rather the component that is a name. This is reasonable argument. On the other hand, naming is culture rather than science. For example, o-o people use getters and setters. Such names are very inconsistent with o-o, but many people think that there are no better alternatives. I still think that <define pattern="ff"><element name="gg">.... is better than <define name="ff"><element name="gg">..... But I do not think that I can persuade you. Let's have a issue, spend some time during the phone conference, vote, and keep going. Cheers, Makoto
Powered by eList eXpress LLC