[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: Issue: references to an external grammar
James Clark wrote: > Is the issue here simply whether we want a shorthand for ... >? I do not have any good ideas. But here are some questions. - How do we avoid rereading? - Does it make sense to introduce two constructs? One is for including external patterns without collisions of named patterns, and the other is for referencing named patterns in already-included patterns. Cheers, Makoto
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC