[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: Reopening Issue 26: regularityConstraint
James Clark wrote: > Hmm. So would you then split the inference rules for oneOrMore into two, > one for the attribute case (which would have empty children), and one for > the children case (which would have empty attributes)? Yes. James Clark wrote: > > I think that the current restriction is extremely hard to understand. > > Do you really think that the BNF in 7.1 is easy to learn? > > No, but I don't think users need to learn it, because it doesn't prevent a > user doing anything that they might reasonably want to do. At present, only the BNF prohibits (@a, a)*. I think that this is very difficult for implementors. Cheers, Makoto
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC