[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Comments about the spec
In section 7.4, > Next, we need the concept that one pattern has another pattern has a > pattern for a child element or attribute with a particular name. I couldn't understand the above sentence. Is this a typo? Or am I showing my inability to read English? In section 4.19, <list><empty/><list> is not transformed to <empty/>. Why not? I couldn't find any other points that I should mention. regards, -- Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI +1 650 786 0721 Sun Microsystems kohsuke.kawaguchi@sun.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC