[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: 7.1 and 7.3 are as bad as XML Schema
I know you don't like 7.3, but do you really not understand it? If you don't understand, please say which inference rules you find hard to understand. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Murata Makoto" <mura034@attglobal.net> To: <relax-ng@lists.oasis-open.org> Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 8:03 AM Subject: Re: 7.1 and 7.3 are as bad as XML Schema > James Clark wrote: > > > I agree that there is scope for improvement in 7.1, but I don't agree with > > you about 7.3. I think the informal concept is very straightforward, and I > > don't think the formalization is any harder than section 6. > > Let's begin with some facts. Who in the TC understands 7.4 and likes it? > Apparently, James does and I don't. How about other members? > > If you claim that you understand 7.4, please give non-trivial examples of > key-ambiguous grammars. > each member > > Cheers, > > Makoto > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word > "unsubscribe" in the body to: relax-ng-request@lists.oasis-open.org > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC