[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: 7.1 and 7.3 are as bad as XML Schema
> I agree that there is scope for improvement in 7.1, but I don't agree > with you about 7.3. I think the informal concept is very > straightforward, and I don't think the formalization is any harder > than section 6. I have carefully read the spec. I think that 7.4 is ten times more difficult than section 6. I am just stunned to hear that you do no think it is harder than section 6. How do others feel? >I also think the restriction is a very natural one. I think that use of grammars instead of path expressions is very ad-hoc. >This > constraint may well be lacking from a theoretical perspective, but I > think it will make very good sense to XML practioner Here we agree. The constraint in the spec is lacking from a theoretical perspective. An ideal solution is to extend my PODS paper so that it can cover attributes. >but I > think it will make very good sense to XML practioner I think that 10% of 7.4 will make very good sense to XML practioners. Cheers, Makoto
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC