[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: Fallback mechanism for the datatype
Message text written by James Clark > The "shall at user option report warning message" bit doesn't work for me. The processor may not be running interactively. A RELAX NG processor might be built into the firmware of a fridge. An implementation may have not any way to report an error or to support user options. I think the critical point that the spec needs to make is that a RELAX NG processor does not become non-conformant merely because it does not support some datatype library. Also if an implementation claims conformance, it should as part of that claim state what datatype libraries it supports. <<<<<<<<< I like this approach. In closed systems, you should always know where the walls start and end. DW.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC