[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: [relax-ng] close schema language
Message text written by Michael Fitzgerald > I was wondering what people think of these comments on closed schema languages on XML-DEV. http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200111/msg00575.html <<<<<<<<<< In ebXML we're avoiding these problems by using the Registry to store neutral assembly instructions. (BTW - notice RELAX + Schematron is ideal for storing those neutral assembly statements). The whole referencing model within registry is driven off a UID and registry host pair - not complex W3C Schema couplings via inheritance and datatyping that may or may not resolve. The precise assembled content instance is thus a single consistent whole - no need for ugly namespace stuff that cannot be resolved at point of use - while retaining ability to maintain centrally and have machine referencable semantics. Here's where the W3C still have not 'got it'. I.e. they are still trying to solve ugly business problems by flatfiles, URLs', heaps of local syntax semantics and includes. The registry model and a RELAX style simple structure only model is compelling by comparison. Next week the ebTWG team is publishing a CCR (core component realization) paper that shows part of this in action. DW.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC