[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [relax-ng] grammar error in compatibility spec
Hmm. Maybe my grammatical instincts have been compromised by living too long in a non-English speaking country, but the use of "were" seems correct to me, since the process of framing (i.e. devising) the restrictions took place in the past. --On 29 November 2001 10:38 -0500 Josh Lubell <lubell@cme.nist.gov> wrote: > > I noticed a minor grammar error in the compatibility spec. I believe the > sentence before the enumerated list at the end of section 1.3 should read > "The goals in framing these restrictions are as follows:" rather than > "...were as follows" > Josh > > Joshua Lubell, NIST > 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8263 > Gaithersburg MD 20899-8263 USA > (301) 975-3563 > lubell@nist.gov
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC