[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [relax-ng] converting relax ng schema to w3c schema?
On Thu, 2002-06-20 at 11:34, James Clark wrote: > I think there is a right choice here, and that is not to try to abuse the > global/local element distinction for something for which it was not > designed. There is a "Right" choice, but there may be "pragmatic" choices too for users who have a requirement to constraint the root element! Furthermore, I do think that the semantic of RNG <define name="barPattern"> <element name="bar"> .../... </element> </define> is closer to a WXS group than to a WXS global element... > >> That's not how I interpret the spec. Which schema processors disallow > >> this? > > > > My interpretation is based on a discussion with Henry Thompson: > > > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlschema-dev/2001Nov/0188.html > > > > And the spec seems rather clear: > > > > http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#mg-props-correct > > I don't agree. See the discussion at > > http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200202/msg00935.html I stand corrected, then! Eric -- See you in San Diego. http://conferences.oreillynet.com/os2002/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com (W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC