relax-ng message

Subject: Re: [relax-ng] Why is the start element always mandatory when agrammar is used

From: "MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)" <EB2M-MRT@asahi-net.or.jp>
To: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 11:25:58 +0900


On Thu, 27 Jun 2002 18:00:40 +0200
Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com> wrote:

> Just out of curiousity, is there a reason why as soon as a grammar
> element is used a start element is mandatory even when there is no
> ambiguity about the root element such as in:

I would be confused if your example is legal.  I would argue that 
bar is the start pattern, since it is the first definition.

Cheers,
-- 
MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) <EB2M-MRT@asahi-net.or.jp>

References:
- [relax-ng] Why is the start element always mandatory when a grammar isused
  - From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>