Re: [relax-ng] Re: Some ideas about type-assignment

["MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)" <EB2M-MRT@asahi-net.or.jp>]

On Wed, 14 Aug 2002 10:34:41 -0400
Kohsuke Kawaguchi <Kohsuke.Kawaguchi@sun.com> wrote:

> The following might be also worth considering:
> 
>     6) determine the element pattern for every element, and the
>        attribute pattern for every attribute.

My (2) "uniquely determine the named pattern for every element" captures 
the first part of your suggestion, but I forgot to cover attributes.

> All these things seem to point toward the constraint we discussed for
> ID/IDREF...

If we consider type-assignment for data binding tools, everything becomes 
more difficult.  I have a feeling that we have to drop or weaken my second goal 
"Type-assignment should be useful for data binding tools".  I will soon 
write my understanding of data binding for relaxer.  Since you have done
more work than me about type assignment for data binding, your opinion 
is very welcome.

-- 
MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) <EB2M-MRT@asahi-net.or.jp>