[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: [relax-ng] [Fwd: [xml-dev] Which next step for examplotron?]
What does Relax NG think? Eric -- Freelance consulting and training. http://dyomedea.com/english/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com (W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema ------------------------------------------------------------------------
--- Begin Message ---
- From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
- To: "xml-dev@lists.xml.org" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Date: 18 Jan 2003 10:36:30 +0100
Hi, I need some feedback concerning future directions for examplotron (http://examplotron.org/)... The idea behind examplotron is to define a schema language in which the schema would as close as possible to sample instance documents. I think that there is a niche for such languages for all the people (including me) who like to start writing sample documents for new vocabulary, check if they meet their needs and eventually derive a schema from these samples documents. The current approach has been to define a specific semantic for examplotron, borrowing concepts from Relax NG and Schematron and write a specific compiler. Another approach would be to consider it as an alternative syntax for Relax NG with embedded Schematron or xvif/xpath rules. Basically, this would come to the point of allowing people to write in a schema: <foo @bar="xxx"/> instead of <element name="foo"> <attribute name="bar"/> </element> or element name {attribute foo {text}} The question is: do we need a third syntax for Relax NG? This syntax might be useful for some, but adding new syntaxes is always confusing. OTH, do we need another schema language with yet another semantic and is there a good reason to take the pain to finalize it (defining it on top of Relax NG would be much more trivial) ? Its (tiny) users community seems pretty happy with it... are they wrong and is examplotron just useless? Thanks Eric -- Rendez-vous a Paris. http://www.edifrance.org/ebd03/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com (W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------- The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>--- End Message ---
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC