[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [relax-ng] Associating documents and schemas
> In working on my Emacs XML mode, I have had to confront the old chestnut > of how to find a schema for a document. I propose to first study (1) existing mechanisms (for DTDs and WXS) and their pros and cons, and (2) requirements by Web Service users, HTML users, and SGML users. Although I do see some values in providing an in-band mechanism for specifying schemas, there are some disadvantages as well. In my understanding, DOCTYPE being the only authoritative mechanism in SGML has caused problems (catalogs help, but not always), while xsi:schemaLocation being a hint has confused users. Internal subsets are convenient but are also problematic. For example, I am not sure if XQuery or XSLT 2.0 can easily handle RNG internal subsets. (How can static type checking take internal subsets into consideration?) It might be an idea to publish a note about in-band schema references and in-band schemas and ask for feedback from the public. Cheers, Makoto -- MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) <EB2M-MRT@asahi-net.or.jp>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]