Re: [relax-ng] What about XML 1.1?

[Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>]

/ David RR Webber <david@drrw.info> was heard to say:
| UNICODE changes excepted?!?

I don't understand your comment David.

| Norman Walsh wrote:
|
|>/ "MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)" <EB2M-MRT@asahi-net.or.jp> was heard to say:
|>| I propose that this TC address the XML 1.1 issue when a future
|>| version of RELAX NG is created. I believe that this cannot be
|>| addressed by an erratum.
|>
|>Alas.
|>
|>Well, I suppose I should console myself that at least W3C XML Schema
|>and RELAX NG have consistent views on the matter. It makes XML 1.1 a nearly
|>pointless waste of time, but that's just the way it is, I guess.
|>
|>                                        Be seeing you,
|>                                          norm
|>
|>
|>

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc.
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

PGP signature